Book Description
This book sets out the foundations of Post Keynesian price theory. Frederic Lee examines the administered, normal cost and mark up price doctrines associated with Post Keynesian economics; he then draws upon those doctrines and previous empirical studies to develop the pricing and production foundations of the theory. This is the only book that is solely concerned with Post Keynesian price theory and its foundations, and represents a major contributon to the literature of post-Keynesian economics.
Download Description
Frederic Lee sets out the foundations of a post-Keynesian price theory through developing an empirically grounded production schema. The administered, normal cost, and mark up price doctrines are explained in parts I-III of the book, as many of their theoretical arguments are important for developing the foundations. This involves discussing the work of Gardiner Means, Philip Andrews, and Michal Kalecki, as well as the developers of the doctrines, such as Edwin Nourse, Paolo Sylos Labini, Harry Edwards, Josef Steindl, and Alfred Eisner. Drawing upon the arguments and formal modelling offered by the doctrines, in conjunction with empirical evidence from one hundred studies on pricing and production, Dr Lee develops an empirically grounded pricing model and production schema. He argues that the model and the schema together constitute the foundations for post-Keynesian price theory.
Customer Reviews:
A book for those who can't understand ch.20 of Keynes'sGT.......2005-03-24
This book is the net result of nearly sixty years of confusion about the microeconomic foundations of the General Theory created by Richard Kahn(RK) and Joan(JR) and Austin Robinson(AR).Essentially,the author of this book blends the administered pricing approach of Gardinar Means,the normal cost pricing approach of Philip Andrews,and the mark up pricing approach of Michal Kalecki and later assorted Cambridge Keynesians into a consistent non neoclassical microeconomic theory that is supposed to allow post keynesians to present a unified front in their microeconomic foundations.Unfortunately,the economics of John Maynard Keynes becomes completely irrelevant because the theory of effective demand and the existence of involuntary unemployment is completely independent of the theory of the firm and/or price theory,be it classical,neoclassical,post keynesian,Kaleckian,non neoclassical,etc.Lee is implicitly basing the need for his clarifying exposition in this book on the claim,repeatedly made by JR,AR, and RK over a 60 year period ,that Keynes failed to support his macroeconomic theory of effective demand with any rigorous microeconomic foundation in price or value theory,a price or value theory which should have been imperfectly competitive in order to be realistic.Keynes provided a completely consistent and rigorous microeconomic foundation for his theory of effective demand based on the theory of purely competitive firms.The mathematical structure of both Keynes's pure competition and A C Pigou's free competition,assumed in his 1933 book,The Theory of Unemployment is, of course, the same as that of perfect competition.Keynes's general theory result,obtained from chapter 10,p116,ft.2 and chapter 20,p.283,ft.2and discussed by Keynes in his comparison-contrast of his mathematical model with that of Pigou's mathematical model in the appendix to chapter 19 of the GT,is that a macroscopic general equilibrium that is optimal is given by the condition that w/p=mpl/(mpc+mpi),where w/p equals the real wage,mpl equals the marginal product of labor,mpc equals the marginal propensity to spend on consumption goods,and mpi equals the marginal propensity to spend on investment goods.If the mpc+mpi=1,Keynes's theory merges with the classical and the neoclassical theories.Onthe other hand,if mpc+mpi
<1,the result will be an unemployment equilibrium with some level of involuntary unemployment.Keynes established the existence of multiple equilibria as the general result to be expected in a capitalist economy with its highly unstable,volatile,uncertain investment sector.None of these Keynesian results are duplicated in Lee's theory.In fact,it is impossible to derive any such result from any kind of imperfect competition theory such as Lee's.Lee can,of course,integrate Keynes's chapter 20 into his model.However, that result is independent of any microeconomic theory.
Average customer rating:
|
An Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics
Marc Lavoie
Manufacturer: Palgrave Macmillan
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
 General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Macroeconomics
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
All Titles
| Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 0230007805 |
Book Description
This book offers an easy to read introduction to post-Keynesian economics, showing that there is an alternative to neoclassical economics and its free-market economic policies.
Book Description
This is a major contribution to post-Keynesian thought. With studies of the key pioneers - Keynes himself, Kalecki, Kahn, Goodwin, Kaldor, Joan Robinson, Sraffa and Pasinetti - G. C. Harcourt emphasises their positive contributions to theories of distribution, pricing, accumulation, endogenous money and growth. The propositions of earlier chapters are brought together in an integrated narrative and interpretation of the major episodes in advanced capitalist economics in the post-war period, leading to a discussion of the relevance of post-Keynesian ideas to both our understanding of economics and to policy-making. The appendices include biographical sketches of the pioneers and analysis of the conceptual core of their discontent with orthodox theories. Drawing on the author's experience of teaching and researching over fifty years, this book will appeal to undergraduate and graduate students interested in alternative approaches to theoretical, applied and policy issues in economics, as well as to teachers and researchers in economics.
Customer Reviews:
There is no error in Keynes's MEC theory of Investment.......2006-12-25
The major problem with this book appears in chapter 4.Chapter 4 purports to analyze chapter 11 of J M Keynes's General Theory(1936).Keynes put forth a Marginal Efficiency of Capital theory(MEC)in this chapter of his book that dealt with the problem of maintaining an optimal stock of capital goods over time.The only formal mathematical technique that could deal with this intertemporal,dynamic problem at the time Keynes was writing was the calculus of variations .Keynes's theory has nothing to do with a MEI(Marginal Efficiency of Investment)approach to investment.Keynes used a two sector calculus of variations approach in his analytic approach to the mec of a particular stock of long lived fixed capital goods.Keynes wrote out his mathematical analysis in English.In 1983,the economics journal HISTORY OF POLITICAL ECONOMY published a paper by S F LeRoy which demonstrated that there was a one to one onto isomorphism between Keynes's English language description of his results and the necessary and sufficient optimality conditions of a calculus of variations approach.Nowhere in this book or in the references at the back of the book is this issue dealt with.Instead,the author simply asserts in chapter 4 that Keynes's analysis is wrong because it does not fit the MEI approach .The author provides no support for his claim.
The other parts of the book cover various economists whom the author views as being pioneers in the Post Keynesian movement.There is, however,no agreement between Post Keynesians,in general,about who was responsible for what development in a certain decade.The assertions of the author then have to be weighed against the assertions of other Post Keynesians,like Paul Davidson.The author admits this,while not recognizing that a reader of his book will not be able to follow the various claims that are made.
Customer Reviews:
A good textbook exposition.......2000-08-19
Lavoie's attempt to write a textbook introduction to Post Keynesian Economics is a success. It accomplishes its goal to help people that are interested in the topic but don't know from where to start. It also helps people that have already started to have an overall perspective of the field. This is truly an accomplishment considering the fact that the different people have different ideas about what Post Keynesian Economics is all about. I enjoyed particularly the division of the book. After an overall introduction, Lavoie gives us two most welcome chapters about Post Keynesian Microeconomic Theory (about consumer theory and the theory of the firm), which are followed by four Macroeconomic chapters (about money and banking, the principle of effective demand, growth economics and inflation). Of course, as all of these topics are "as complex as it gets" and the space avaliable is limited, everyone will probably have some particular complaint about the treatment given to some particular topic. One must acknowledge that the advanced references to all the topics (and to almost all the different tribes within the Post Keynesian label) are there, though. Therefore, if you are interested in the topic you should buy the book. And do not pay attention to some of Lavoie's romantic excesses (specially in the first and last chapters).
Book Description
In this definitive volume, now available in paperback, over 80 distinguished contributors from four continents provide authoritative critical discussion of the principal areas of controversy in post Keynesian economics, including all significant issues in methodology, economic theory, applied economics and policy. Each entry surveys the relevant literature and highlights the strengths and weaknesses of post Keynesian contributions. The Companion deals with areas of continuing debate inside post Keynesianism and sheds light on the current relationship between post Keynesians, mainstream economics and alternative heterodox schools of thought. The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics will be widely read by academic economists, economic policymakers, research students and advanced undergraduate students of economics as well as academics in related social sciences.
Customer Reviews:
An in-depth scholarly study of the economics and Keynesian theory.......2006-03-15
Ably edited by J.E. King (Professor of Economics in the Department of Economics and Finance at La Trobe University, Australia), The Elgar Companion To Post Keynesian Economics is an elaborate collection of post Keynesian economic theory from the words of those who used the Keynesian theoretics. As an in-depth scholarly study of the economics and Keynesian theory, The Elgar Companion To Post Keynesian Economics delves extensively into a political and theory-based post-Keynesian economics, including essays, analysis and other contributions from dozens of economic leaders worldwide. The Elgar Companion To Post Keynesian Economics is very highly recommended to all Business School as well as Economic theory majors at the college or university level.
A good book to read for Post Keynesian true believers.......2005-10-25
This book contains about a 100 2-10 page articles written by Post Keynesian economists(PKers).Post Keynesianism is a school of economics founded by Cambridge economists Joan Robinson,Richard Kahn,Austin Robinson and their American supporter,John Kenneth Galbraith in the early 1970's.Two of their acolytes,Sidney Weintraub and Paul Davidson,founded The Journal of Post Keynesian Economics in the late 1970's.The purpose of the Post Keynesian school is to correct the many technical errors they claim(with no supporting evidence)were committed by John Maynard Keynes in 1936 when he wrote the General Theory(GT).The PKers claim that Keynes was a brilliant ,intuitive innovator and discoverer of new economic ideas who lacked the capability to use mathematical analysis and microeconomic theory to present a formal,technical analysis of what it was he meant to say.PKers concentrate their study of Keynes's GT on chapters 2 and 3 of the GT and chapters III and IV of Keynes's A Treatise on Probability.They claim that Keynes recognized that economic analysis could not be based on formal mathematical modeling.The same holds for applications of probability.They claim that Keynes recognized that ,in general,no numbers could be used in the estimation and calculation of probabilities.All probabilistic analysis in economics,social science, liberal arts,and every day practical decision making must be done using ordinal relationships,which can be done only in some instances due to the existence of uncertainty about the future.At least half of the essays in this book just reexpress what I have summarized above.The rest of the review will be devoted to correcting the errors made in a number of the selections taken at random.Toporowski,in the selection Kaleckian Economics,claims that the problem with Keynes's GT is that the"...microeconomic foundations..are largely absent in Keynes's General Theory.(Their absence had facilitated the neoclassical and monetarist interpretation of Keynesian unemployment as being due to wage inflexibility)..."(2003,p.228).Any competent mathematician can find Keynes's completely worked out microeconomic analysis in chapters 19,20,and 21 of the GT.Toporowski's error reappears in the selection "Effective Demand",written by M.Setterfield.He confuses and conflates Keynes's D,Z,and Y functions.For example,he claims that Z=pO where p is an expected price and O equals real output.Keynes defines D=pO five times on pp.283-284 of the GT,while Z=P +wN,where P equals expected economic profit,w equals the current money wage,and N represents aggregate employment.Only E.Tymoigne's selection,Expectations,escapes error.Finally,O'Donnell's selection,Treatise on Probability,repeats the F.Ramsey error,made many times by Ramsey in two book reviews of Keynes's TPin 1922 and 1926,respectively,that Keynesian probabilities,in general, do not use any numbers.Thus,a decision maker must rely on"Ordinal comparison,which generates the much bigger class of non-numerical probabilities..."(2003,p.362).This directly contradicts Keynes's definition of nonnumerical probability as a probability that lies between two numbers,an upper limit and a lower limit,given on p.160 of chapter 15 of the TP.O'Donnell's errors show up in a number of other selections,such as Non-ergodicity,Uncertainty,and Liquidity.These errors,however,will not matter to the Post Keynesian true believer.
Average customer rating:
- The vast majority of Keynesian probabilities are intervals
|
New Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics
S. Pressman
Manufacturer: Routledge
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
All Titles
| Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 0415229820 |
Book Description
Eichner's classic A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics (1978) is still seen as the definitive staging post for those wishing to familiarise themselves with the Post-Keynesian School. This book brings the story up-to-date.
Of all the subgroups within heterodox economics, Post-Keynesianism has provided the most convincing alternative to mainstream theory. The main representatives of Post-Keynesianism from both sides of the Atlantic are represented here, including Paul Davidson, Geoff Harcourt and Sheila Dow.
Customer Reviews:
The vast majority of Keynesian probabilities are intervals.......2005-06-26
This book contains a collection of essays that explain what Post Keynesian economics is(for instance,a heavy emphasis on fundamental uncertainty[Keynes defined this type of uncertainty to be ignorance in his A Treatise on Probability(TP,1921),p.315,and p.315,ft.2.The weight of the evidence,w,would equal 0.],expectations,and the importance of historical time as opposed to purely logical/mathematical treatments of time)and how it is applied to such areas as pricing theory, economic growth,money,inflation,the labor market,government institutions and debt finance.All of the essays are badly marred because they,implicitly or explicitly(Dow,p.14;Wray,p.82),accept an error filled assessment of Keynes's logical theory of probability and decision theory made by J.Barkley Rosser Jr.in essay number 6 that supposedly deals with Keynes's analysis of uncertainty and expectations.Rosser apparently believes that p.33 of the TP alone contains Keynes's entire approach to the measurability of probability.The same identical error was made by F Ramsey in two error filled reviews of Keynes's TP in 1922 and 1926.Rosser claims that"...where Keynes(1921,33)distinguishes four cases:there are no probabilities at all...;there may be some partial ordering of probable events but no cardinal numbers can be placed on them;there may be numbers but they can not be discovered for some reason;and there may be numbers but they are difficult to discover"(Rosser,p.54;many other similar errors are committed on pp.55-61).Keynes made it very clear on p.37 that his final word on measurement was contained in Part II(chapters 15 and 17)of the TP.On pp.160-163 and pp.186-194 of the TP,Keynes makes it very clear that most probabilities can be specified by interval estimates.However,per his discussion in chapter III,in many cases such interval estimates will overlap to some degree and hence cause problems of nonrankability,nonmeasurability,noncomparability and incommensurability.The only purpose for purchasing this book would be in order to compare the numerous incorrect statements about probability made in this book with the actual analysis provided by Keynes in the TP.The TP contains the first systematic exposition of an interval estimate approach to probability in the history of probability and decision theory.Nowhere in this book or in any other book published by Post Keynesians has the basic interval estimate nature of Keynesian probabilities been acknowledged.
Average customer rating:
|
Stabilization and Growth in Latin America: A Critique and Reconstruction from Post-Keynesian and Structuralist Perspectives
Leonardo Vera
Manufacturer: Palgrave Macmillan
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
Policy & Current Events
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Development & Growth
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Economic Policy & Development
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Banks & Banking
| Industries & Professions
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| International
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Finance
| New & Used Textbooks
| Stores
| Books
General
| Economics
| Business & Finance
| New & Used Textbooks
| Stores
| Books
Banks & Banking
| Finance
| Business & Finance
| New & Used Textbooks
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 0312232691 |
Book Description
Latin American countries initiated since the 1980s a reorientation of economic policies in whose formulation and implementation the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank (WB) have played a key role. This book shows that the IMF/WB programs have not achieved the expected results and allows the reader to understand the shortcomings and limitations of the orthodox approach. By analyzing the macro-models that inspire policy-based lending, the author argues that the weaknesses arise as a result of a questionable internal logic of the models, mistaken premises and a failure to account for the empirical evidence. The book claims and outlines an alternative Post-Keynesian and Structuralist framework to deal with stabilization and growth issues in Latin America. The basic model is based on important asymmetries among productive sectors and takes into account the existence of oligopolistic markets, money wage rigidities, income distribution and endogenous money. It is implied in this model the need to rethink the direction and overall form of economic policy.
Book Description
This is a unique, comprehensive and international history of the post Keynesian approach to economics since 1936. The author locates the origins of post Keynesian economics in the conflicting initial interpretations of Keynes's General Theory and in the complementary work of Michal Kalecki.
The book, now available in paperback, begins by focusing on Cambridge Growth, Distribution and Capital theory and early post Keynesian thought in the US. The failure of post Keynesian theory to supplant the neo-classical paradigm in the 1970s is also discussed, along with an overview of post Keynesian thinking in other countries. The book then deals with the search for coherence between various strands of post Keynesian thought and other schools of economic thought. The author concludes by assessing the progress made by post Keynesian economics since 1936 and considers several possible alternative futures for the post Keynesians.
Historians of economic thought as well as post Keynesian and other heterodox economists will warmly welcome A History of Post Keynesian Economics.
Customer Reviews:
The Founding of the PK school occurred in 1954-1956.......2005-03-07
King's history of Post Keynesian(PK) Economics gives a general overview of the founding of a distinct PK view.A distinct PK school is traced back by King to two individuals,J M Keynes and M Kalecki.King covers the claim made,according to one of the founding PKers,by Joan Robinson, that Kalecki had written a superior,mathematical version of the theory of effective demand three years(1933) before Keynes wrote his supposedly strictly literary analysis in the General Theory(GT) in 1936.These claims ,as King shows,have led to the fracturing of the PK school.King also covers the capital theory controversies between Cambridge,Massachusetts(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)and Cambridge,England(Cambridge University)over the roles played by the rate of interest and theoretical neoclassical production functions in capital reswitching .The main conclusion that a reader will come to is that the disparate and disputing subschools that make up the PK school have absolutely no clue as to how Keynes arrived at the conclusions he did since they accept the canard put out by Richard Kahn that Keynes was a poor mathematician since 1927.Various assorted PKers,such as Lorie Tarshis and G C Harcourt,have contributed mightily to the "What did Keynes really mean if we assume that he was rational?"debate,a debate which only calls into question the basic coherence of the PK school.This has naturally led to a chaotic situation.Unfortunately,King(K)lacks the mathematical skills(basic differential and integral calculus) needed to work out the technical analysis that John Maynard Keynes provided in chapters 10,20,21, and the appendix to chapter 19 of the GT, in order to rectify the situation.An understanding of the technical analysis worked out by A C Pigou in chapters 8-10,pp.86-102,Part II,of The Theory of Unemployment(1933)is a necessary prerequisite needed in order to understand the comparison-contrast that Keynes made in the appendix to chapter 19 of the GT between his model and Pigou's model.A reader who has covered the above mentioned chapters will be in a good position to discover that PK economics is essentially based on the 1954-1956 error filled Economic Journal exchange over Keynes's aggregate supply function carried on by Dennis Robertson,Ralph Hawtrey,de Jong,and Harry Johnson,who wrote an error filled mathematical appendix for Robertson,who was a self admitted mathematical illiterate.Three of the main founding fathers of PK economics,Sydney Weintraub,Douglas Vickers and Paul Davidson,simply adapted the Dennis Robertson-Harry Johnson case"iii-(a)"as their own.Unfortunately,the Robertson-Johnson model, in their case iii-a, contains three errors.The first error is that the expected aggregate supply function Z=g(N)=pO.On the contrary,Keynes defined ,in chapter 20,that his expected aggregate demand function D=pO,where p is an expected price and O=F(N) is an aggregate production function defined as such by Keynes on p.283 of the GT.Keynes's expected aggregate supply function is correctly specified as Z=P+wN,where P is defined by Keynes to stand for expected or future economic profit,w is a fixed or variable money wage,and N equals total aggregate employment.This result is easily obtained from pp.23-25 of the GT or by integrating the derivative specified by Keynes on pp.55-56,ft.2 or by integrating the derivatives specified by Keynes on pp.282-286 of the GT.The second error is the Robertson-Johnson claim that D=C+I.In chapters 5,6 and 10,Keynes specifies that Y=C+I.On page 209,Keynes further specifies that Y=PO,where,in the context of the Y-multiplier model of chapter 10,Y equals actual aggregate demand and P equals the actual price level.The third error is setting Z=pO=D=C+I,since the LHS is denominated in expected units while the RHS is denominated in actual units.Keynes's correct specification is D=pO=Z=P+wN.Both sides are correctly denominated in expected units.D=Z then specifies Keynes's aggregate supply curve,which is a locus of all possible pairs of expected prices and expected profits.The actual result,Y,will pick out one member of the set defined by D=Z.If mpc+mpi=1,there will be no involuntary unemployment(mpc equals the marginal propensity to spend on consumption goods while mpi equals the marginal propensity to spend on investment goods).If mpc+mpi
<=1,some level of involuntary unemployment is present in the macroeconomy.All PKers accept and work with the mathematically incorrect and incoherent models of Davidson,Weintraub,and Vickers.The mathematical errors and misspecifications in their own models are the reason why the PKers have failed in their challenge to the orthodox schools of economics since 1960.
Average customer rating:
|
Empirical Post Keynesian Economics: Looking at the Real World
Manufacturer: M.E. Sharpe
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
Econometrics
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Economic Policy & Development
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Macroeconomics
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 0765613298 |
Average customer rating:
- Just a rewrite of Paul Davidson's interpretation based on D.Robertson's interpretation
|
Post Keynesian Economics: Debt, Distribution, and the MacRo Economy
Thomas I. Palley
Manufacturer: Palgrave Macmillan
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Macroeconomics
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 0333630599 |
Customer Reviews:
Just a rewrite of Paul Davidson's interpretation based on D.Robertson's interpretation.......2006-06-29
The potential reader of this book should simply save his money because Palley bases his anaysis on the massive misinterpretations made by Paul Davidson,who based his interpretation on S.Weintraub's interpretation of Dennis Robertson,a self admitted mathematical illiterate,who claimed that Keynes's theory had to be contained in Keynes's discussions on pp.24-30 of the GT,although Keynes himself told Robertson quite bluntly that his theory was not presented technically in chapter 3 of the GT.Palley gives the standard claim that Keynes's theory of effective demand is in chapter 3 of the GT,but that,since Keynes gave no mathematically correct foundation for his theory of effective demand,one has to read between the lines to figure out what Keynes must have really(really) meant if he was rational.P immediately slides down the slippery slope created by Robertson in articles published in the Economic Journal in England in the period 1954-1956 with the help of an error filled mathematical appendix provided by Harry Johnson.P misdefines Z as equaling pO,where p is the price level and O is real output.This is mathematically incorrect since integration of Keynes's footnote on pp.55-56 of the GT and of the derivatives given by Keynes on pp.283-285 prove mathematically that Z= wN+P,where w is the money wage,N is the amount of aggregate employment,and P is expected economic profit.All of Palley's results suffer from this mathematical error on his part,which was passed down to him by P.Davidson.
Books:
- Principles of Corporate Finance + Student CD + Ethics in Finance PowerWeb + Standard and Poor's (McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Est)
- Public Choice III
- Quantitative Methods for Business (with Crystal Ball Pro 2000 v7.1, CD-ROM, and InfoTrac )
- Race Against Empire: Black Americans and Anticolonialism, 1937-1957
- Rational Choice and Criminal Behavior: Recent Research and Future Challenges (Current Issues in Criminal Justice (Routledge (Firm)).)
- Real Estate Market Analysis: A Case Study Approach
- Reasoning by Mathematical Induction in Children's Arithmetic (Advances in Learning and Instruction)
- Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America
- Restaurant Franchising
- Romancing Mister Bridgerton (Bridgerton Series, Book 4)
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- History: Fiction or Science
- Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to Fight Terrorism and Build Nations...One School at a Time
- Introduction to Limnology
- Morphological Integration
- Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists
- The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process And Technology
- The Hundredth Man
- Isamu Noguchi: A Study of Space
- Noise Control Manual for Residential Buildings
- Sedums of Europe - Stonecrops and Wallpeppers
Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis
The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers
Reorienting Economics (Economics As Social Theory)
The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies
