Blind Trust (Second Chances Series #3)

Book Description

An unexplained eight-month disappearance of Sherry Cranston’s fiancé leads to murder and a flight for their lives.

Customer Reviews:

Another great book in the series........2006-03-16

Great book, easy reading. Hard to put down.

Riveting.......2002-08-24

Terri Blackstock penned another winner with "Blind Trust," Page after page of this well written thriller draws and keeps you in the midst of a battle against the forces of evil. A gut-wrenching narrative that has you wondering just who are the good guys and who can you trust. A fabulous example of learning to 'let go and let God.' If you haven't read any of Terri Blackstock's novels buy one today and you will soon be a Blackstock fan.
Beverly J Scott author of Righteous Revenge

Blind Trust.......2002-01-24

Wonderful book in a great series. A must read with the other books in this series. Will enjoy other books by Terri Blackstock as well such as Emerald Windows, Broken Wings, etc.

Wow, wow and WOW!.......1998-11-06

Blind Trust is STUPENDOUS!!! I could not put it down. As usual, Blacstock has combined romance, Faith, love, hope, mystery, suspense and excellant Christian, family values to make a wonderful book. The characters are believable and she portrays the emotions so well. I could almost see the scenes as the story progressed. This is a book that I highly recomend if you want something good to read.

Blind Trust was excellent!.......1998-10-26

Blind Trust is about Sherry, who eight months before, was going to be get married to Clint Jessup. But, two weeks before the wedding Clint dissapears and no one knows where he went. After learning that Clint left and wasn't forced to, Sherry struggles to get her life back together. Now, eight months later, Clint shows up,and insists that he had a good reason for everything. Trust Him, he says. Sherry hurts, and doesn't want to love him again. He won't tell Sherry what happened and why. Not yet. Sherry then gets caught into the "nightmare" that Clint has been involved in and now, they must leave everything in God's hands...

When God is Silent: Choosing to Trust in Life's Trials

Average customer rating:

Encouraging?

When God is Silent: Choosing to Trust in Life's Trials
Charles R. Swindoll
Manufacturer: Thomas Nelson
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books

Inspirational | Spirituality | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books

Getting through the Tough Stuff
Perfect Trust
Great Lives: Fascinating Stories of Forgotten Lives (Swindoll, Charles R.)
Encourage Me
The Mystery Of God's Will

ASIN: 1404101470

Book Description

This positive book of encouragement and hope is compiled from text in the newly released Job by best-selling author Charles Swindoll. His practical application of the Bible to everyday living makes God's truths a reality to people experiencing loss, uncertainty, and doubt. This book will be directed at a broad audience of both genders.

The object is to create a book that will provide encouragement, comfort and direction for the matrix of modern life. Based on guidelines gleaned from the life of Job, the book will focus on:

a) Seven things Job teaches us about ourselves

b) Seven things Job teaches us about God

Customer Reviews:

Encouraging?.......2007-06-12

I hate this book. I am being treated for cancer and I received this from a fellow Christian to encourage me.

Beautiful cover, lush photos, nice paper and words inside that basically say, "God's in control, you have nerve to question your situation, so suck it up". I almost felt like I was being scolded for not cheerfully accepting my fate. Very surface level stuff - nothing doctrinally deep at all. And unless you have read the book of Job or were familiar with scripture (Paul's story especially) there is nothing to really relate to in this book.

I would never give this book to an unbeliever because they would walk away feeling like they were nothing more than a pawn in some cosmic game. I have received much better devotionals devoted to getting me through this hard time with faith and hope - this book bolstered neither.

Can God Be Trusted in Trials (Tony Evans Speaks Out Booklet Series)

Average customer rating:

Can God Be Trusted in Trials (Tony Evans Speaks Out Booklet Series)
Tony Evans
Manufacturer: Moody Publishers
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

General | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books

General | Religion & Spirituality | 4-for-3 Books Store | Stores | Books

All 4-for-3 Deals | 4-for-3 Books Store | Stores | Books
Similar Items:

God Can Not Be Trusted (and Five Other Lies of Satan) (LifeChange Books)
God Is Up To Something Great: Turning Your Yesterdays into Better Tomorrows (Life Change Books)
The Grace of God
God, Do You Really Care?: Finding Strength When He Seems Distant
Tony Evans Speaks Out On Spiritual Warfare (Tony Evans Speaks Out Booklet Series)

ASIN: 0802443796

Book Description

A frequent stumbling block for Christians and non-Christians is how to handle adversity. Why aren't we promised an easy ride once we accept Jesus as our Savior? Tony's book explores why God allows trials, and then delivers practical steps for responding to them and emerging victorious!

Trust on Trial: How the Microsoft Case Is Reframing the Rules of Competition

Average customer rating:

Fascinating View of Microsoft Propaganda
obviously biased analysis
Richard McKenzie: Trust on Trial
The Government's case is baseless and destructive
good ideas, not enough followup

Trust on Trial: How the Microsoft Case Is Reframing the Rules of Competition
Richard B. McKenzie
Manufacturer: Basic Books
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

Company Profiles | Biography & History | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Strategy & Competition | Management & Leadership | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Popular Economics | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Business Law | Reference | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

High-Tech | Industries & Professions | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Digital Law | Business & Culture | Computers & Internet | Subjects | Books

Antitrust | Business | Law | Subjects | Books

General | International Law | Law | Subjects | Books

Amazon

Is Microsoft truly a classic monopoly, whose aggressive pursuit of markets for Internet browsers and operating systems is harmful to consumers and worthy of government intervention? Or has it actually been a victim of aggressive rivals (led by Sun, Novell, Oracle, and IBM) who called in high-level favors to keep Bill Gates & Company out of the lucrative market for network servers? Richard McKenzie, a noted economist with the University of California at Irvine and the author of more than 20 books, is convinced of the latter. He advances a formidable argument on that behalf in Trust on Trial, which maintains "the Microsoft case has shown--and not for the first time--how politics can taint the antitrust enforcement process." Starting with copies of major U.S. antitrust laws, McKenzie shows how cases such as this eventually may affect consumers in both the short and long term. With some people unconditionally opposed to anything out of Redmond, of course, his thesis won't convince everyone the government proceedings are a sham. But even many of Microsoft's detractors should concede that he makes a compelling point, particularly with his overriding contention that the process is usually political. "More than Microsoft is now on trial: trust in antitrust enforcement is on trial," he says. --Howard Rothman

Book Description

An incisive argument proving that current rules of business competition are rendered obsolete by the dynamics of information-age companies.

Trust on Trial, a hard-hitting examination of competition in the modern marketplace, tackles the monopoly issue head-on. Through the lens of the Microsoft case, the first large-scale antitrust proceedings of the digital age, it challenges the efficacy of modern antitrust enforcement. While testing the appropriateness of new economic assumptions-from network effects to lock-ins-it forces us to ask whether nineteenth-century antitrust law, combined with twentieth-century enforcement norms, is applicable to the twenty-first-century problems of business organizations.

Customer Reviews:

Fascinating View of Microsoft Propaganda.......2002-02-10

Mr. McKenzie's piece on the Microsoft monopoly is amusing if factually biased and tendered towards Microsoft.

Considering all legal disputes in regards to Microsoft's guilt are a moot point, the nature of this works is to try the legal system to deflect attention from Microsoft's anticompetitive behavior. These circumstances lead one to wonder what the class status of a lawbreaker is such that it can argue that it is in fact the law that is incorrect, not the behavior.

This title is a fascinating lobbying piece and a valid historical reference of Microsoft Propaganda in the Antitrust Years.

obviously biased analysis.......2001-06-27

As an attorney with a background in antitrust law, I was anxious to find a book that could cut through all the hype surrounding the Microsoft case. McKenzie approaches the case with an obvious axe to grind in favor of Microsoft; now, that's okay, as long as he still makes rational arguments. But his argumentation reads like a law school student trying to prove his antitrust professor wrong. I will give just one example--he argues that Microsoft isn't a "monopolist" because they "only" control 90% of the market. Anyone familiar with antirtrust law knows that the term "monopoly" need not be taken literally, and that market power can be exercised by a firm controlling far, far less than 90% of a market. Such spurious argumentation make you wonder if Bill Gates didn't subsidize this book.

Richard McKenzie: Trust on Trial.......2001-03-08

As an economist specializing on public policy, I have found the Microsoft case fascinating enough to have plowed through the economists' testimony in the case, the briefs from DOJ and Microsoft, the judge's findings, and a bit of the interpretive writings.

Mc Kenzie proved an excellent guide. My assessment is that the government totally failed in establishing the critical premises that Microsoft had a monopoly and predatory practices were a plausible strategy. The government's case on these points barely existed, and its lead expert contracticed himself and his prior writings. In contrast, Microsoft's expert economist present a coherent argument about why Microsoft should not be considered a monopolist and why the charges of predation were invalid. The government sought to hide this deficiency by concentrating on the tertiary point that Microsoft was aggressive. The government's experts and the judge got so steamed up about the appearances that they forgot the fundamental economic point the aggression without monopoly is useless.

The judge showed no understanding of the economcs and was not particularly astute about what any experience computer user knows. For example, he swallowed the government nonsense about the difficulties of downloading. (If it were so difficult, this site would not be as good as it is. )

McKenzie's careful, economically sound review of the case gives a perspective sadly lacking in the journalistic accounts that I have seen (including the press and magazine articles that were the basis for two of the three available journalistic accounts).

McKenzie, in particular, concentrates on the germane issue of why Microsoft should not be considered a monopolist out to overcharge consumers. He shows that the case really is one of rivals, unable to compete in the marketplace, running to Washington for aid. The book is a readable introduction to these critical economic points. It tells how the case developed and what the underlying economics are. People wanting a treatment of what really matters in the case should skip the journalists and try McKenzie. He is evidence that technical problems that journalists fear to treat can be made understandable.

The Government's case is baseless and destructive.......2000-07-30

This book by Professor McKenzie shows how baseless and destructive the Government's antitrust case against Microsoft is. He shows that the case is harming the economy, consumers, and the stock market. Significantly, in 1998 the Government lost the primary part of the case that it is now pursuing against Microsoft, the combining of a brower with the operating system. Those of us who use computers know that Microsoft has continually made the process easier throughout the years.

The Government's case is certain to fail, and will only serve to help elect George Bush, because of its devastating impact on the world's single most important company, and the American stock market. With friends like Joel Klein, Al Gore doesn't need any enemies.

David W. Lee Edmond, Oklahoma

good ideas, not enough followup.......2000-07-12

This book makes many correct arguments, but too often does not flesh them out sufficiently. This is especially frustrating because the meat is there to be had; the DoJ's case IS absurd. McKenzie could have used more input from someone well-versed in computers.

An example: McKenzie mentions Jacksons "application barrier to entry", but doesn't bring up the obvious reasons why that particular argument falls flat on its face. Applications are not magic beans that can detect the underlying OS and only run on approved ones. They are just data that you feed to an OS, like you feed "data files" to applications. So it is entirely plausible to create an application which takes other applications as data. A straightforward extension of this idea is creating a program on, say, Macintosh that can execute Windows programs -- and in fact such programs already exist. This renders the "application barrier" nonexistent, and the entire monopoly charge right with it. But McKenzie missed this entire line of argument.

And, of course, there is Java, which is essentially the same idea. The Judge seems aware of Java's "platform independence capability" but he is too technically ignorant to see that this undermines his entire applications barrier premise. Sadly, McKenzie is, too.

Book Description

Is it the central purpose of American antitrust policy to encourage decentralization of economic power? Or is it to promote "consumer welfare"? Is there a painful trade-off between market dominance and economic "efficiency"? What is the proper role of government in this area? In recent years the public policy debate on these core questions has been marked by a cacophony of divergent opinions--theorists against empiricists, apostles of the "new learning" against defenders of the traditional structure-conduct-performance paradigm, "laissez-faire" advocates against "interventionists." Utilizing a distinctively innovative format, Walter Adams and James Brock examine these issues in the context of a courtroom dialogue among a proponent of the new learning (Chicago School), a prosecuting attorney, and a U.S. district judge. In contrast to bloodless "scientific" treatises or ideologically inspired polemical tracts, this book lays bare the central arguments in the debate about free-market economics and the latent assumptions and disguised terminology on which those arguments are based. The dialogue is both gripping and entertaining--designed by the authors to be reminiscent at times of the Theater of the Absurd.

Customer Reviews:

Strawmen abound.......2006-08-01

This book is based on a novel concept: instead of a dry textbook, a conversation between opposing sides is presented, ostensibly at a "trial". The format is clever enough, but the substance lacks. The expert representing the Chicago school is subject to a number of ad hominem attacks, presenting him (and thus the school) as detached from reality.

Make no mistake, this book exists for one reason only: to criticize the defenders of the Chicago school of economic thought. So blistering was the criticism, while couched in friendly words, that I felt forced to read one of their leading theorists, Becker. (I wasn't sufficiently familiar with the school.) Without making judgment between the two sides, I was taken aback by how different the actual tenents of the school were than as presented in Brock's book. Yes, each position is held by some person -- the citations are dense -- but Brock's attempt to meld all untenable positions of this school leads to a laughable strawman.

If you're looking for talking points, this book may suit your needs. Otherwise, take my word and pass on this one.

Much better than expected.......2000-06-29

After reading the back cover and introduction of this book, I expected a rather harsh portrayal of neoclassical economics. This book does not end up being too crtical of the Chicago school. Of course there are a number of strawmen in this book, portions where the expert is portrayed as an out of touch academic oblivious to the effects of his theories. Perhaps my greatest criticism of this book is that it does not adequately exlore the "sovereign's charter" - the government maintained monopolies. The authors refer to the concentration in the airline industry without really considering the effects of regulation that excluded foreign airlines from domestic routes. In addition, the authors do not seem to commit enough attention to the availability of substitutes for virtually any commodity or service. Even if the major airlines offer fewer flights from a particular airport in the long run smaller air lines will establish routes. If not, there are alternatives like high speed rail. At the exteremes, one could consider technological advances like teleconferencing and electronic data exchange reduce the need for certain forms of business flights. Overall, however, the book only takes a few hours to read and introduces the major debates of this subject.

Interesting, open-ended.......1998-09-09

This is the same topic the authors have tackled in their other books, this time presented in a somewhat screenplay-ish format. Once again it is an argument between theory and evidence. As you read the discussion between the lawyer and the economist you wonder why the economist always retreats to theory in the face of evidence. It would interesting to hear a Chicago economist's explanation of the facts Adams and Brock bring to bear.

Congress scrutinizes charity disparity.(victims of World Trade Center/Pentagon terrorist attacks): An article from: Trial

Average customer rating:

Congress scrutinizes charity disparity.(victims of World Trade Center/Pentagon terrorist attacks): An article from: Trial
Kristin Loiacono
Manufacturer: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital

Management | Management & Leadership | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Terrorism | Current Events | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on January 1, 2002. The length of the article is 858 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Congress scrutinizes charity disparity.(victims of World Trade Center/Pentagon terrorist attacks)
Author: Kristin Loiacono
Publication: Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2002
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 38 Issue: 1 Page: 11(1)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Doctors, patients don't trust clinical trials; recruitment being hampered.(More Education, Support Needed): An article from: Internal Medicine News

Average customer rating:

Doctors, patients don't trust clinical trials; recruitment being hampered.(More Education, Support Needed): An article from: Internal Medicine News
Jennifer Silverman
Manufacturer: International Medical News Group
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital
ASIN: B0008278RS
Release Date: 2005-07-31

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Internal Medicine News, published by International Medical News Group on February 15, 2004. The length of the article is 759 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Doctors, patients don't trust clinical trials; recruitment being hampered.(More Education, Support Needed)
Author: Jennifer Silverman
Publication: Internal Medicine News (Magazine/Journal)
Date: February 15, 2004
Publisher: International Medical News Group
Volume: 37 Issue: 4 Page: 6(1)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Don't trust the middleman: pharmacy benefits managers can exploit their position at the center of a complex drug-delivery system to rip off consumers.: An article from: Trial

Average customer rating:

Don't trust the middleman: pharmacy benefits managers can exploit their position at the center of a complex drug-delivery system to rip off consumers.: An article from: Trial
Steve W. Berman , and Thomas Sobol
Manufacturer: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on April 1, 2005. The length of the article is 2305 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Don't trust the middleman: pharmacy benefits managers can exploit their position at the center of a complex drug-delivery system to rip off consumers.
Author: Steve W. Berman
Publication: Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: April 1, 2005
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 41 Issue: 4 Page: 56(5)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

John Marsden's Will: The Hornby Castle Dispute, 1780-1840

Average customer rating:

John Marsden's Will: The Hornby Castle Dispute, 1780-1840
Emmeline Garnett
Manufacturer: Hambledon & London
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Biographies & Memoirs | Subjects | Books

General | World | History | Subjects | Books

Social History | Historical Study | History | Subjects | Books

General | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books

General | Law | Subjects | Books

Legal History | Perspectives on Law | Law | Subjects | Books

Judicial System | Perspectives on Law | Law | Subjects | Books

General | Legal History | Law | Subjects | Books

Wills & Probate | English Law | Law | Subjects | Books

General | English Law | Law | Subjects | Books

Private Law | Law | Subjects | Books

General | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books

All Titles | Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007 | Stores | Books
ASIN: 1852851589

Book Description

John Marsden's Will is the story of an extraordinary legal case. John Marsden himself was a mentally retarded Lancashire gentleman, looked after by his aunt. A servant, George Wright, became the aunt's lover and steward of Marsden's estate, continuing in office even after the aunt's death. When the unmarried Marsden finally died, his will effectively left Hornby Castle to the steward.The will was then contested by the heir at law, Admiral Sandford Tatham, basing his claim on the incapacity of his cousin to understand and therefore endorse a complex will. Because John Marsden's mental state was at the heart of the case, depositions were taken by sides from all who had known him. This evidence allow us not only to follow the case but also to see the personalities and emotions of the men and women involved. In particular, it enables us to see Marsden himself in remarkable detail, from his fruitless attempts to learn his tables to his death from a stroke while in an earth closet. It is very rare for a handicapped person's life in any period before the twentieth century to be traceable in this way.Tatham faced the problem that English courts were loath to overturn a will. The admiral suffered numerous set-backs in his attempt to oust Wright, as the action was fought out in a variety of courts followed by appeals, delay, manoeuvre and intrigue. The prolonged struggle and its outcome was followed by an enthralled public throughout the country.

Managed Care On Trial: RECAPTURING TRUST, INTEGRITY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN HEALTHCARE (Hfma Healthcare Financial Management Series)

Average customer rating:

Rambling, Poorly written.
Captivating, Empowering, Pulls no punches!

Managed Care On Trial: RECAPTURING TRUST, INTEGRITY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN HEALTHCARE (Hfma Healthcare Financial Management Series)
DENNIS ROBBINS
Manufacturer: MCGRAW-HILL HEALTH CARE EDUCATION GROUP
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

Management | Management & Leadership | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Personal Health | Health, Mind & Body | Subjects | Books

General | Health, Mind & Body | Subjects | Books

Public Policy | Government | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

General | Administration & Policy | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Health Care Delivery | Administration & Policy | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Hospital Administration | Administration & Policy | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Practice Management & Reimbursement | Administration & Policy | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Public Health | Administration & Policy | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Emergency Medical Services | Allied Health Professions | Medicine | Subjects | Books

General | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Book Description

Although managed care affects over 100 million Americans and continues to extend its reach across this country, its successes are often overshadowed by a deterioration of consumer confidence, as evidenced by the literally thousands of legislative and regulatory initiatives aimed at taming managed care. Managed Care on Trial explores the ethical and legal issues that arise from managed care and offers a prescription for the eroding confidence in the system by resorting trust, integrity and accountability. Managed Care on Trial seeks to arm the physician and other healthcare providers with knowledge that will better enable them to bridge the gap between fscal mandates and clinical standards, and to negotiate with payors as active partners rather than passive recipients in dealing with the challenges of marketplace demands. It is also oriented as a guide for consumers seeking better ways of addressing and solving the problems posed by the rapid transformation of the healthcare system. Included in the book are reviews of some of the most dramatic legal cases involving managed care.

Customer Reviews:

Rambling, Poorly written........1999-04-10

It's true that managed care is on trial--literally and figuratively. But this rambling, disjointed, and wholly incoherent book offers little to justify its publication. Do not take my word for it. Go to the library and pick it up. Open it and read ... you will be shocked that it is for sale at any price.

Captivating, Empowering, Pulls no punches!.......1998-07-06

This book unpacks many of the hidden agendas in managed care and provides useful and practical advice to the reader on how to better understand and navigate the turbulent waters of managed care. This book is written by a well-known health systems advisor and leader,keynote speaker and expert witness with over 20 years experience in the field coupled with a dynamic foreward and introduction by Mark Hiepler often called the "Rainmaker" or "89 million dollar man" because of his record breaking 89.3 million dollar jury verdict against a large managed care. organization and involved in over 150 cases representing patients and physicians in diverse managed care scenarios. Learn the intricacies of why you have such difficulty getting a referral, how to challenge a denial of care determination,and even how to find the right attorney, if needed. Managed Care on Trial also explains how financial incentives can induce your physician to delay or undertreat and what you can do in such circumstances, Discussion of the key elements of the 1200 legislative and regulatory initiativies to tame managed care last year are highlighted, including helpful guidance and cutting edge information to assist you. State of the art information has been collected from such organizations as the AMA, prominent national trial attorneys and key figures in American Health Care. The book has been reviewed by national figures who say that the "insightful and incisive analyses of emerging controversies and challenges in mananged care are unparalled and offered in a refreshing and captivating style which transforms complicated issues into useful information for the consumer" Jeanne Boling MSN, CCRN,CDMS, CCM Exec Director Case Management Society of America. Another reviewer indicates that "not only does the book deliciously entertain but also offers uselful tactics as well. The book is not only informative but is enjoyable as a courtroom thriller. Indeed in his final chapter Dr. Robbins puts ! managed care on trial brilliantly and provocatively"... Jacek Franaschek M.D. FACEP Past President American College of Emergency Physicians. Philip Corboy, former president of the American Trial Attorneys Assn indicates that "readers as diverse as a lawyer planning to depose the CEO of an HMO or a patient seeking assistance in comparing providers will finds this book a well reasoned resource". Mark Hiepler writes that " if HMOs read and put into action Robbins practical ideas, patients will bypass the courtroom and go directly to the operating room. The patients who value their lives, the doctors who value their practices, and the HMOs that value their bottom lines can all learn life saving as well as cost saving principles by reading Managed Care on Trial".

Books:

Books Index

Books Home

Recommended Books