Arrangement b...'
Customer Reviews:
Helpful.......2006-06-22
The author's focus is on trading on the basis of trends, market timing, and chart analysis. There's a lot of discussion of technial issues about limit orders, options, and so on. He gives you a lot of very valuable warnings about the "perilous pitfalls" of investing, especially for active traders. I learned a lot about this book, and that's the bottom line. I took this book out from the library. I don't know that I would buy this book, unless I were a "day trader," or at least much more active than I am now.
I read the second edition, not the most current 3rd edition. I did, however, compare the table of contents of both editions, and it looks like the author tried to organize the content better. But it looks like the same basic material.
I couldn't get into this book.......2006-01-08
This book was a bit confusing for me probably out of my league for this time. I took this book out of the library and gave it a try, I read some chapters and skim some part but I ended up being lost. Stock Market Rules, Third Edition, is a book, an in-depth, up-to-date examination of the 50 axioms that will most help investors gain the edge in today's technologically supercharged markets. Investors needing authoritative, hands-on guidance will look to this updated edition for its:
-Short sections covering the 50 most immediately useful rules
-Easy-to-read yet analytical approach
-Arrangement by research, strategy, and other major topic areas
Great book for investors who already has a hands on the market.
Just OK - shallow content and poor editing.......2005-08-24
This book is promising, but ultimately disappointing. A beginner investor will find this book confusing, because it skips around multiple topics without much contextual or background material. An intermediate or advanced investor will find this book trite, because each topic covers familiar ground, and lacks any depth or detail. You will find a few good tidbits here and there, but overall the content is shallow.
The author is a fan of Dow Theory, and the book is littered with references to Dow Theory this and Dow Theory that. The text is overly reliant on the Dow Industrial Average, which in my opinion is an inferior index to use when analyzing the general stock market. Unless you are interested in one of the merely 30 old-line slow-growth industrial companies that comprise the DJIA, you would be better off using the S&P 500 Index or the Nasdaq Composite Index for your market study.
Remarkably, this book appears not to have been edited at all. Despite being in its third edition, the book contains numerous typographical, numerical, and factual errors in both the text and the illustrations. In a casual reading I noted more than 10 serious errors. Table 3-1 shows 11 companies, with their current and historical prices, along with the percentage-change in each price. 7 of the 11 calculated price changes are blatantly wrong! It is hard to trust an investment book that can't calculate percentage-change correctly. Table 3-2 lists a company stock buyback totaling only $250.00. The text refers to "Points A, B, C and D" in Figure 5-3, but no such points appear on the Figure. And so forth all throughout the book.
Paying money for this book is a poor investment. Borrow it from your local library instead.
Superb Stock Trading How-To .......2005-07-19
Absolutely terrific...Stock Market Rules, (Third Edition), analyzes and explains fifty axioms (the rules) to tell you those which really work, the ones which used to work but don't anymore, as well as the axioms which are now and always have been terribly wrong. Beyond merely explaining these rules, Michael D. Sheimo uses them to help the reader learn about stock trading. This is extremely helpful to the beginning investor, as well as the investor who's been at it for a while. Filled with useful information and analysis on how to invest in today's fast-moving markets, Stock Market Rules, (3rd Edition) reveals the truth of what has been said and is still being said. It provides techniques and ideas that can improve your investing confidence and results.
Here are a few of the gems:
Rule #3: Good Companies Buy Their Own Stock
(not necessarily)
Rule #2: Price Doubling Is Easier At Lower Prices
(just not so)
Rule #9: Look For Insider Trading
(you can too, Martha)
This book is excellent now as it was in the past and will be in the future. The short, quick, clever chapters are easy to read and memorable.
So Now You Know Why..........1998-10-05
This book explains the logic and reasoning behind the 50 most popular Wall Street axioms and mottos. If you're still one of those old-fashioned types who still use full-service brokerages, now you'll know when your broker is BSing you, and when he / she really knows his / her stuff.
Customer Reviews:
No Comebacks (Revised).......2007-10-24
This book was a gripping read. Paul Stiles's analysis of The Market is so penetrating, incisive, devastating, and powerful there really can be no comeback to it. He tore away the veils. His book explodes with insightful information.
I enjoyed this book, too, because it is carefully written. The sentences are well-crafted, You know you are reading a work of art while also reading a book on economics and social science.
One striking passage in the book is what I'd like to point to. It is a brief passage in the book, but it has its own unique value as an excerpt of someone thinking with both sides of his brain. It has to do with what happens in economic terms with the turkey on Thanksgiving Day. The author lets the reader know that the laissez-faire people do only look at the production-side of making turkey for Thanksgiving and that they overlook other values and costs involved as well in the production of turkey: integrity, courage and honesty, and compassion for others. These values and costs are not only overlooked, they are dismissed or taken quite for granted.
I found myself wishing Paul Stiles had more punch as a philosopher, however, when he wrote of the interior world or so-called spirituality. His arguments are philosophically weak and naive, especially in the context of "moral absolutes," where he writes about the Ten Commandments.
The last third of the book was just pure religious mush. He gives short shrift to atheists, equating them only with materialists, and he fails utterly even to mention the ancient Greeks who had much to contribute to the development of the Founding Fathers' ideas for the United States.
Still, his analysis of the Market is a genuine tour de force, and it is worth the price of the book.
Sorry, fallacious and ignorant. Author buys into media hype........2007-08-07
I'm sorry but no. I'm surprised that there aren't more negative reviews. But then again, there aren't many reviews, period. There are only 16? That speaks to the impact this book has had and will have: very little, largely because it is fundamentally flawed. It is chock full of fallacies and ignorance. Paul doesn't do so much as analyze as try to prove his theory. His logic is not sound. The more reviews this book will generate, the more negative the reviews will be.
I will quote Presidential Candidate Ron Paul in one of his addresses to Congress, "When economic trouble hits free markets and free trade are often blamed, while the harmful effects of a fiat monetary system are ignored." He has written some books on economics. I suggest these as counterpoints to Is the American Dream Killing You. Some are free to read. Look at wikipedia for links.
The positive reviews are in line with the trend in this world towards socialism and against competition. The trend towards socialism is due to... tada! The media! The media is subtly driving us to socialism and corporatism, which is another word for fascism. Look it up. It's very sneaky, and this book is buying into that clap-trap. Think: Who owns the media? Big business.
The fact is, freedom works. But big business doesn't want it. It doesn't want competition. And they use the government to stamp out competition. Government should stay out of our lives and our pocketbooks. Genuine competition keeps businesses honest. We are in the fix we are in BECAUSE government HAS gotten involved. Just as the church and state was separated, so too must business and state. THAT is the real solution to our economy. All the government should be allowed to do is control the money supply. It hasn't done that since the inception of the Federal Reserve - a private (for profit) bank. (Who do you think the FED profits from?) That is where our money is: in the pockets of the owners of the Federal Reserve.
I would like to hear a review by someone who actually knows something real about genuine honest competitive capitalism.
An example that proves he is right........2007-03-06
This is an excellent book. If you are skeptical, just apply his theory to what is happening to us in the New Orleans area after Hurricane Katrina.
The Superdome was redone within a year after Katrina so that the sports "market" recouped their lost money.
The schools are still in disrepair.
The projects are left empty.
The poor and middle class are still in FEMA trailers and are struggling to rebuild.
The hotels have been restored and are making money on tourists.
Our coast is loosing land at the rate of football fields each day.
The oil industry, one of the major causes of the reclining coastline, are reporting profits, but will not spend the money to restore the coast.
At the same time they (oil companies including energy companies) raise the prices of fuel (gasoline, oil for heating homes, electricity) blaming it on Katrina.
Insurance companies are doing the same. Rates are higher, or they are refusing to insure us blaming this on the cost of Katrina, Rita, and other hurricanes, all the while reporting profits.
THe governments inaction and/or slow action will make the situations worse or impossible as the cost adds up each day that nothing is done.
Many in this nation have forgotten us because we are not the major story anymore, but if you are interested, look up our problems on our local websites. Paul Stiles could easily write a book proving his points by focusing on New Orleans.
I hope that there will not be another major disaster because the big "market companies" will benefit while the poor and middle class suffer even more.
The Man Behind the Curtain Exposed.......2007-02-04
As a 31 year old mother living in a suburban wasteland, I frequently ponder the destruction of American society. In my crackerbox quality townhouse, freezing in the winter and cooking in the sun (no trees in this tract, cookiecutter development) in the summer, I watch the wind blasting through, blowing litter into our postage stamp sized yards. No mothers are home--instead, they are shuttled via SUV to huge corporate chain day care centers, where they are cared for by bitter, swarthy immigrants. My son and I feel utterly alone.
I drive through the ugly, wide roads littered with McDonalds, generic chains and gas stations. Something feels so...empty. Modern life is alienating, lonely, boring, and sick.
There is no community. Women are competitive even about mothering. Money rules all.
No wonder I dream of buying some wooded acres and starting an organic farm/commune!
Paul Stiles is a deeply sensitive and intelligent man, a great writer, and someone with a lot to say about why we are all popping Prozac and junk food these days. I enjoyed the narrative at the beginning--while I didn't agree with every single point, I also live in the DC area suburban wasteland, so I could relate to his points about sprawl, angry commuters, and McMansions.
The look at corporate greed and corruption in recent years was eye-opening. Everyone seems to have their fingers in the till, and the result, I predict, will be a 30's scale depression within the next 20 years. I consider moving to New Zealand to escape the coming hard times.
A Clarion Call Against the Excesses of Modern American Capitalism.......2006-05-27
Paul Stiles's "Is the American Dream Killing You?" is a caustic, provocative polemnic against what he regards as the worst excesses of American capitalism. He depicts "The Market" as a soulless, amoral entity, that is grinding away the best attributes of American culture and society; namely individualism and personal liberty for the sole sake of generating as much profit as possible, whatever the ultimate social and personal cost to those engaging in the pursuit of maximizing profit. He describes forcefully how "The Market" is destroying the traditional American family, forcing people to work longer and longer hours, at the expense of providing genuine familial care to their children and fellow adult siblings. He also notes how pernicious "The Market" has been in our feeble attempts in resolving the prospect of uncontrolled global warming - in stark contrast to what can be done now to control the most adverse effects of raising the Earth's surface temperature by a few degrees Celsius over the course of this century. Sounding somewhat naive, I think, Stiles urges us to return to our core basic beliefs, emphasizing the importance of strong religious faith as an important glue to the tattered fabric that is now American society. As someone trained in evolutionary biology, I also take issue with his misappropriation of Darwin's Theory of Evolution via Natural Selection, seemingly conflating it with Social Darwinism; itself an illegitimate intellectual offspring of Darwin's work, which Darwin himself soundly rejected, since he harbored a more liberal view of humanity than what proponents of Social Darwinism were advocating in Victorian Britain.
Book Description
The concise, common-sense insights of a day trading pro
Some traders spend thousands of dollars attending training seminars. If you don't have the time or resources for that, pick up Rules of the Trade instead. This reliable, no-nonsense guide distills the insights of several online trading experts into one short, quick, and easy-to-read book that not only lists the rules, but explains what the rules mean, why they’re important—and the high costs of overlooking them even once.
Packed with real-life examples to illustrate key points, this book— written by David S. Nassar, author of the bestseller
How to Get Started in Electronic Day Trading
-- will teach you the basic rules of survival, help you preserve capital, learn the ropes, and go on to succeed in this lucrative but volatile profession.
Download Description
The national best-selling author brings his latest, offering the key rules and tips you need to succeed in electronic trading.
Customer Reviews:
One of the best.......2006-03-27
I have read lots, and lots, and lots, of trading books. Most of them are not that great but contain a few valuable nuggets here and there, so they are all worth reading to me.
This book is nothing BUT valuable nuggets. It is well thought-out and well written by a widely recognized successful trader/trainer/manager. It really captures the essence of what short-term trading is all about, of which daytrading is a major component. It's a trading book for traders by a trader. Those just wanting to swing-trade, well, ...good luck. Professional traders trade, period. Good swing trades are found by actively trading, from a daytrading perspective.
Yes, the trading landscape has changed when we went to decimals - for the better! What is discussed in this work transcends the eras. Therefore I consider it to be a 5-star classic. It is not for beginners, it is for stock traders who are constantly wanting to improve. It does not give specific trading set-up tactics that become outdated.
Not much has fundamentally changed in the markets since the tech bubble. Those mastering the concepts in this book will be ready to get rich from the next wave of irrationality in the market, whichever way it goes, and in the meantime can still make a nice living. It belongs on your shelf if you are serious.
[...]
A NEW EDITION WOULD BE WELLCOME.......2006-02-25
Before all I want to say that many topics are given for granted and I find the book not really easy for a beginner. Markets have changed a lot since this book was written and many chapters need revision having in mind that many readers are non native speakers of english and have no idea of many topics given for granted
another nassar piece of garbage.......2005-12-30
if you read these books and follow his fluff then you will be robbed of your money by professionals like me. trading takes advanced and sophisticated methods not capable of being properly expressed in a book targeted to the masses. people spend years educating themselves to be able to pick money from the inexperianced, like those who buy this book. best of luck and you can find good use for the book proping up a table of starting a fire after your done reading it
Mismatch between Title, book description and content.......2004-01-06
I bought the book based on excellent reviews here and very attractive description.
However, I have been very disappointed because the content does not reflect the attractive title and description. The book is almost 100% for daytraders trading with level II screen. This is not said anywhere. "Online" does not mean exclusively daytrading to my opinion. It keeps on repeating "be disciplined" to fill space. One of the example of trade record given does not fit the explanation given in the text. For example, the trader made most of his profit in a single swing trade lasting several days whereas Nassar wants to show us that the guy is a good daytrader...
Another interesting thing: This book is not for beginners but it describes in fact very general basic rules... in a tough style that assumes that the reader already knows almost eveything.
When you read the table of contents, it looks great: how to enter, to exit, etc... but none of this is given in the book. No techniques are given.
Conclusion: This book could be fine if the description was fitting the content. It is for daytrader watching level II screen and who trade instinctively.
not particularly useful.......2003-09-19
Although this book has a copyright date of 2001, it apparently was written in early 2000, just at the start of the NASDAQ crash that ultimately resulted in a loss of over 75 percent of its value. Consequently, the author refers to a period of time when stocks traded in fractions, and high-flying tech stocks trading in the triple digits were "momentum" traded by daytraders. After the crash, many of those tech stocks trade in the single digits, all stocks now trade in decimals, and the "momentum" daytraders and their daytrading brokerage firms are now history. The author makes numerous references to "shadowing the axe" using Level II quotes to determine who is on the inside ask or bid. Nowadays, ECNs virtually always sit on the inside ask and bid, making it impossible to utilize that strategy. Even if a market maker had a large enough position to sit in front of the ECNs, he most likely would route much of his order to an ECN where it would appear anonymously in order to disguise his intentions.
The problem with writing a book about trading strategies or systems is that the markets are constantly changing, and trading systems become obsolete and must evolve over time. What doesn't change is the emotions and psychology of the people who compose the markets. The author states numerous times that trading is about 90 percent mental. While this is in fact correct, he then only briefly touches on the mental and psychological barriers that must be overcome in order to trade successfully. The best books on trading understand this, and are devoted almost totally to this subject.
There are also numerous inaccuracies. At one point, he details a month of trades from an "anonymous" daytrader who allegedly made 731 trades during the month, of which 377 were winners, with those trades averaging $93.03 profit. He then claims the trader netted $68,001.35 for the month. If you think about it for a minute, this is a mathematical impossibility. Also, he makes the typical mistake in believing a broadband connection is necessary to receive timely streaming quotations. Broadband speeds up downloads only with large size files. Streaming quotes do not fall into this category. I have timed my quotations against a T1 connection using an atomic clock accurate to 1 millionth of a second and have detected no difference. I do not use broadband, as it is not available in my area.
If in fact the author is a successful trader, it would have been much more productive for him to detail his own evolution as a trader, as well as the evolution of other specific successful traders he has known. This is the information that would be most useful to new traders. Unfortunately, the author only briefly discusses a few of his own trades, and gives no information whatsoever on the path he traveled to reach competence, assuming he has reached that level. It would also be interesting to see how he is trading in the post-bubble market, if in fact he is still trading successfully.
Product Description
History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate on history ever written - however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data. The book is well-illustrated, contains over 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays, which never cease to amaze the reader. Eminent mathematician proves that: Jesus Christ was born in 1153 and crucified in 1186 The Old Testament refers to mediaeval events. Apocalypse was written after 1486. Does this sound uncanny? This version of events is substantiated by hard facts and logic - validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient sources - to a greater extent than everything you may have read and heard about history before. The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue! For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing to see the magnificent edifice of classical history to turn into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first seeing the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient marble turn into a mere layer of dirt - one that meticulous unprejudiced research can eventually remove. The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with the awareness of just how many areas of human knowledge still trust the three elephants of the consensual chronology to support them. Nothing can remedy that except for an individual chronological revolution happening in the minds of a large enough number of people.
Customer Reviews:
Has history been tampered with?.......2007-10-23
Watch Video Here: http://www.amazon.com/review/RAZQNMXM4M9CL Has history been tampered with? Yes, it has! Did events and eras such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Roman Empire , the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance, actually occur within a very different chronology from what we've been told? Yes, they certainly did!
The history of humankind is both drastically shorter and dramatically different than generally presumed.
Why is it so? On one hand, it was usual custom to justify the claims to title and land by age and ancestry, and on the other the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters. The so called universal classic world history is a pack of intricate lies for all events prior to the 16th century. World history as we learn it today was entirely fabricated in the 16th-18th centuries. It's likely that nobody told you before, but
there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that is reliably and independently dated prior to the 11th century.
Naturally, after what you've learned in school and university, you will not easily believe that the classical history of ancient Rome, Greece, Asia, Egypt, China, Japan, India, etc., is manifestly false.
You will point accusing finger to the pyramids in Egypt, to the Coliseum in Rome and Great Wall of China etc., and claim, aren't they really ancient, thousands of years ancient? Well, there is no valid scientific proof that they are older than 1000 years!
The oldest original written document that can be reliably dated belongs to the 11th century!
New research asserts that Homo sapiens invented writing (including hieroglyphics) only 1000 years ago. Once invented, writing skills were immediately and irreversibly put to the use of ruling powers and science.
The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the 16th century by the Jesuits.
The world history was compiled from contradictory mix of innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts and other irrefutable proofs delivered by late mediaeval astronomers that were cemented by the authority of writings of the Church Fathers.
Early in life, we learn about ancient history. Children love the magical lessons of history - they are like fairy tales. Teachers recite breathtaking stories; very soon We learn by heart the names and deeds of brave warriors, wise philosophers, fabulous pharaohs, cunning high priests and greedy scribes.
We learn of gigantic pyramids and sinister castles, kings and queens, dukes and barons, powerful heroes and beautiful ladies, emaciated saints and low-life traitors.
Ancient history is based documents, manuscripts, printed books, paintings, monuments and artefacts - called primary sources.
The problem is that neither these ancient documents, nor events described therein can be irrefutably dated, moreover they contradict each other for the most part.
When a school textbook tells us that Genghis Khan in year X or Alexander in year Y, have each conquered half of the world, it means only that it is so said in some of the written sources.
There are no answers to simple questions:
When were these primary sources written?
Where and by whom were these sources found?
It is wrongly presumed that ancient and medieval chronicles, written by Genghis Khan's or Alexander the Great contemporaries and eyewitnesses, are readily available. Actually, only sources written hundreds or even thousands of years after the events are there, compiled mostly in the 16th 18th centuries, or even later.
As a rule, these sources suffered considerable multiple manipulations, falsifications and distortions by editing. At the same time,
innumerable originals of ancient documents under various pretexts were destroyed in Europe under various pretexts.
The names of persons and geographical sites often changed meaning and location during the course of the centuries.
Geographical locations became clearly defined on maps only with the advent of printing.
This made possible the circulation of identical copies of the same map for purposes of the military, navigation, education and governance tasks.
Historians from Oxford say: "hey, everybody knows that Julius Caesar lived in the first century B.C.
`Julius Caesar' statement is only a point of view as
there is simply no irrefutable documentary proof that Julius Caesar or any other great name of antiquity ever existed.
Better than that - extremely rare sources that can be reliably dated back to the 10th-14th centuries A D, do not show the polished picture of classical history.
They show a picture both contradictory and confusing.
All methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts are erroneous:
Radio-carbon C14 method produces dating with exactitude of plus minus 1500 years, therefore it is too crude for dating of events in historical timeframe!
The Almagest tractate, which lies as corner stone contemporary chronology, compiled in the 2nd century A D by Ptolemy, the founding father of astronomy, contains astronomical data of 9th to 16th century!
The Bronze Age,that has supposedly began 5000 years ago. Bronze is made of 90% copper and 10% tin, but the technology for tin extraction dates back to 14th century A D!.
All eclipses contained in manuscripts, like Thucydides one, relating 'ancient' events have exclusively medieval dating. All horoscopes cut in stone or painted in Egyptian temples, like Dendera have exclusively early medieval dating solutions.
Not quite what you have learned in school? Open your eyes, and, you will find sufficient proof to reach step by step the inevitable conclusion that the classical chronology is false and therefore, that the history of ancient and medieval world universally accepted today, is also false. Have a fresh outlook on everything said or printed about "ancient" and "enigmatic" Roman, Greek and Egyptian, medieval as well as all other "lost and found" civilizations.
Antiquity and Dark Ages are phantoms invented in the 16th 18th and polished in 19th 20thcenturies. Human civilization is in fact barely 1000 years old!
This book will change your perception of History forever!
What if Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were invented during Renaissance?
What if The Old Testament was a rendition of events of the Middle Ages?
What if Jesus Christ was born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD?
Sounds Unbelievable?
Not after you've read "History: Fiction or Science?" by Anatoly Fomenko, the genius mathematician.
Armed with astronomy and computers Anatoly Fomenko turns History into a rocket science.
Calculations are only as good as your numbers.......2007-08-03
Yes, we can all agree that mainstream history is nearly 100% BS due to politics, economics, ego, problems with dating techniques, and various conspiracies. Agreed. But, I've been researching the distinct possibility that human history (in terms of civilizations) are much more ancient than we've been told, so coming across this book was very interesting to me. I wondered how Fomenko could be wrong (if at all) because he is very persuasive in his presentations. Then it dawned on me. If at previous times in prehistory, due to the various catastrophies that are well documented (comets, asteroids, planetary disruptions, plasma discharge, pole reversals, etc) the Earth was in a different position in relation to the sun, different tilt on its axis, different orbit, different rotation (in terms of velocity and DIRECTION), and the continents were in different positions, then would this not cause the ancients to see the sky (constellations) differently? In other words, is Fomenko making erronious assumptions about the physics of the Earth in pre-history, which then corrupt his data with regards to dating the relevant astrology? The last event to seriously disrupt our planet occured roughly 3500 years ago, according to other good researchers, so is it possible Fomenko has been confused by this? The vastly different physics of our planet in the not so distant past may explain this confusion, which is not to say the "mainstream" version of history is correct; on the contrary. I am not an expert in these fields, but wanted to see if this idea could spark discussion.
Pants on fire?.......2007-07-19
Will people ever read before spamming? Yes, Jesuits could not rewrite world history alone, they had help. Anyway, Dr Prof Acad A.Fomenko does not point to jesuits as the driving force of world wide history manipulation in published volumes 1,2,3;, actually he barely mentions the poor devils. Check it with 'Search inside' feature, please. China is rarely mentioned either, in fact, Dr Fomenko is completely eurocentric. Right, his theory contradicts all mainstream schools of history, because in their actual state they are all built on blatantly erroneus chronology. You don't need a mysterious cabal (conspiracy) to falsify history, the falsification is its modus operandi. It is inherent to history(ians) to falsify (distort) events, as it is inherent to humans to boast as it is inherent to power (authority) to legimize itself by referrring to glorious past made to its own order. Dr Prof Fomenko and team have identified scores of instances of such manipulation in Russian, European, etc.. history, and delivered valid statistical proof thereof. His own 'reconstruction' is completely another story. Forget c14 as a valid method of dating. W.Libby has initially discovered a brilliant method of INDEPENDENT dating. Too bad, c14 method has become a joke after a forced marrige with dendrochronology with consensual chronological scale inbuilt. Radiocarbon method can't stand blind tests, but is so very productive as a rubberstamp.
Accepted History & Chronology Must Be Changed. .......2007-04-09
There is no doubt that history as most know it is a sham, & institution's version of History both University & Church is fradulent & inaccurate. Everything was established with an agenda, The real "Dark Ages" are now when we have access to incredible amounts of information past authorities & more important 'common folk' didn't have but our institutions & educators are slow to evolve because of what has ignorantly & arrogantly been taught for too long. This is on many subjects not just Chronology.
For anyone to question "Why would a Mathematician have anything credible to say of History?" The answer is from Dr. Fomenko's preface in the book: "It would be worthwhile to remind the reader that in the XVI-XVII century Chronology was considered to be a subdivision of Mathematics." These volumes could possibly be some of the most important works to date & should be read by everyone with an interest in History, especially professors & educators who have a duty to the public. I have read both books & must say that 'Chronology 1' has some very eye opening & revolutionary information. Even if these volumes are part true the implications are profound & opens the doors to further investigations & questions which must be done. I speak several different lanquages & must say the logic Dr. Fomenko uses with "inflection" of words & words being read from left to right in one region & right to left in another then written backwards, the removal of vowels & get down to basics of words, or different cities & locations having the same name etc. is correct. Vowel usage has always been optional & varied, actually complicating linquistics & study. The first thing one has to understand is that words never had a fixed spelling in history like we do now, the spelling of words was mutable & regional, as well as names & titles of people were vast, varied & changed, NOTHING WAS FIXED or understood linear. Matters of Life & Death as well as financial profiteering yesterday & today were & are made with ignorant, illogical & conspiratorial views of history & reality, it's time people get closer to the Truth & society collectively grow up.
Very Interesting.......2007-03-07
It is a good proposal and I believe it will mature into something even better in the future. I think it deserves to be read.
Books:
- The Handbook of Fixed Income Securities
- The Law of Tax-Exempt Organizations, 7th Edition
- The Law of Tax-Exempt Organizations, 7th Edition
- The Leaky Funnel: Earn More Customers by Aligning Sales and Marketing to the Way Businesses Buy
- The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns (Little Book Big Profits)
- The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns (Little Book Big Profits)
- The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns (Little Book Big Profits)
- The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns (Little Book Big Profits)
- The Love Languages of God: How to Feel and Reflect Divine Love (Chapman, Gary)
- The Market for Virtue: The Potential And Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- Branded Nation: The Marketing of Megachurch, College Inc., and Museumworld
- Sea of Thunder: Four Commanders and the Last Great Naval Campaign 1941-1945
- Highlander: The Complete Watcher's Guide
- In the Days of the Vaqueros: America's First True Cowboys
- Portrait Of A Killer: Jack The Ripper -- Case Closed
- The Historian
- Sulfate-reducing Bacteria
- Corporate Valuation: A Guide for Managers and Investors with Thomson ONE
- FASB Accounting Standards, Nineteen Eighty-Eight to Nineteen Eighty-Nine: Current Text Industry Stan
- Murder, She Wrote: A Question of Murder
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
The Neatest Little Guide to Stock Market Investing (Revised Edition) (Neatest Little Guide to Stock Market Investing)
One Up On Wall Street : How To Use What You Already Know To Make Money In The Market
Intelligent Investor: A Book of Practical Counsel
Fire Your Stock Analyst: Analyzing Stocks On Your Own (Definitive Guides (Financial Times/Prentice Hall))
Morningstar Guide to Mutual Funds: Five-Star Strategies for Success
